A New Work-Family Agenda for Washington

lauri's storyA bout of flu, car accident, or cancer diagnosis too often leads to a family economic crisis. Most workers have only limited paid leave to deal with their family health needs, and many have no leave at all.

The Work and Family Agenda assures that everyone has Paid Sick Days for preventive care or when a nasty virus hits, as well Family and Medical Leave Insurance for the handful of times in their careers when they need longer periods of time off – to welcome a new child, recover from surgery, or care for an aging parent.

WA’s 2013 Legislature begins Jan. 14th

It will be a tough session, but with your help we can show legislators why paid sick days and paid family leave are so critical for building healthy families and a strong economy.

Click here and share your story about a time paid sick days or paid family and medical leave would have helped you.

share your story

Family and Medical Leave Insurance

In 2007, Washington approved FMLI to provide parents of newborn or newly adopted children up to 5 weeks of partly paid leave. FMLI as originally adopted was too skimpy. It also wasn’t funded and has been delayed until 2015.

Our new FMLI proposal:

  • Up to 12 weeks to care for a new child or sick family member, and 12 weeks for the worker’s own serious health condition;
  • Benefits of 2/3 weekly pay, up to $1,000/week;
  • Premiums starting at 0.2% of worker’s pay, divided between employees and employers (about $1.00 per week for the average $50,000 earner.)
Paid Sick Days

Paid sick days prevent the spread of disease and keep everyone healthier by encouraging sick workers and kids to stay home – away from co-workers and schoolmates. Yet an estimated 1 million people working in Washington have no paid sick leave, including in restaurants, retail, and health care. WA can join San Francisco, Washington DC, Connecticut, and Seattle in passing paid sick days:

Our standards for paid sick days: 

  • Workers earn up to 5 to 9 days, depending on the number of employees in business;
  • For health needs of worker or family member;
  • “Safe leave” to deal with effects of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking.

Republican lawmakers ignoring even their own base on paid family leave

This article, by NAME, originally appeared in The Atlantic magazine
This article, by Sharon Lerner, originally appeared in The Atlantic magazine

It’s widely known that the U.S. is way out of step with the rest of the world in not having paid maternity leave. We are now one of only three nations – rich and poor – that don’t guarantee job-protected time off with some amount of income after the birth of a child.

It’s less widely understood just how globally out of whack we are. To get a sense, consider the countries we trail in terms of laws that support women’s ability to physically recover from birth and bond with a child: Afghanistan, which has a 26 percent literacy rate and 9 million people living on less than one dollar a day, yet still manages to provide new mothers with 12 weeks off with pay; Djibouti, an African nation plagued by civil war and drought that is home to many nomadic herders and still manages to guarantee 14 weeks of paid maternity leave; and the Democratic Republic of Congo, one of the poorest nations in the world—if not the very poorest—which nevertheless offers mothers 15 weeks off with full pay.

Conservatives, independents, and liberals - all by huge majorities - favor better family policies, according to a new poll. [Photo: erin_ryan]
Conservatives, independents, and liberals – all by huge majorities – favor better family policies, according to a new poll. [Photo: erin_ryan via Flicker Creative Commons]
What’s still unknown at this point is whether the U.S. is closer to joining the rest of the world in providing this basic human decency now that Obama has won a second term. Advocates are gearing up to finally get leave laws passed. And they have reason to be optimistic.

While Republican lawmakers—many of whom seem to reflexively oppose any legislation that appears to take the side of human need over that of business—still control the House of Representatives, Obama won the presidency handily, and Democrats are still in control of the Senate. Perhaps most important, voters from both parties want family and medical leave.

Seventy-three percent of Republicans said they think it is important that the new Congress and the president consider laws that help secure working families, such as paid family leave and paid sick days, according to an exit poll conducted by Celinda Lake and released today by the National Partnership for Women and Families. Support for these policies is, not surprisingly, even higher among independents (87 percent) and Democrats (96 percent), according to the poll.

No doubt this bi-partisan enthusiasm stems from the fact that most people realize that, without paid time off, they could well be financially ruined by having an illness in the family or new baby to care for. Nearly three-quarters of voters (72 percent) polled, including 78 percent of independent and Republican-leaning women, said they would likely face significant financial hardships in such a situation.

In this grim economic climate, in which a baby can seem more like a jumble of bills than a bundle of joy, it’s easy to see why there is renewed enthusiasm about the possibility of getting paid leave through in the next four years. Family and medical leave not only makes for happier workers who can fulfill their family responsibilities, it also allows those folks to stay in their jobs.

Toward that end, the National Partnership is now working with Rep. Rosa DeLauro to draft a paid family and medical leave bill that is based on expanding the principles behind Social Security into a national system that provides paid time off to workers caring for a sick family member or new baby.

Realists may take note of the fiscal cliff and other paralysis-inducing arguments now consuming Washington and point to the fact that, as yet, there’s no obvious Republican sponsor for such a bill. But if there won’t necessarily be immediate movement on paid family and medical leave in Washington, there will undoubtedly be some in the states.

In January, the Washington state legislature will be considering a bill that would expand the parental leave legislation that passed in 2007 but was never funded. The new law would cover illnesses as well as the birth or adoption of a baby. And, because it also creates a funding mechanism, advocates are hopeful that, this time, it will actually go into effect.

Meanwhile, in New York, a coalition of public health, labor, and women’s groups is launching its own campaign to get family and medical leave insurance passed. In part because New York already has a state-wide disability insurance system in place (the kind that Washington lacked), optimism is running high.

“This is the right moment for a program that will help working families,” says Sherry Leiwant, co-president and co-founder of A Better Balance, one of the organizations spearheading New York’s push. “We are hopeful that the governor and state legislature will agree.”

If they do, the state may soon join New Jersey and California in providing paid time off to workers who have new babies or sick relatives – and hopefully leading the entire country out of the family-policy dark ages.

For many workers, basics such as fair pay and sick time can be elusive, and many are beginning to speak up.

This article, by Cindy Krischer Goodman, originally appeared in the Miami Herald
This article, by Cindy Krischer Goodman, originally appeared in the Miami Herald

Ashley Maddox boards a bus and heads to work at a South Beach restaurant, a chore that can take up to 1 ½ hours. Once she arrives, she writes up orders, serves food and clears tables. Some days she brings home just $20, other days more. When her shift ends, the single mom heads back home on the bus to her toddler son, who she leaves in the care of his grandma or aunt, or a friend.

Ashley Maddox hugs her son, Miguel Romero III, who will be 2 in December, n her Little Havana apartment before leaving for work. [Photo: Marice Cohn Band/ Miami Herald Staff]
Ashley Maddox hugs her son, Miguel Romero III, who will be 2 in December, n her Little Havana apartment before leaving for work. [Photo: Marice Cohn Band/ Miami Herald Staff]
Each week, Maddox’s schedule changes, making a more stable child-care arrangement challenging. Whether she has a cough, cold or fever, Maddox still gets on the bus and goes to work. “I don’t get any sick days or benefits and I need my job.”

Last week, when low-wage workers gathered to show support for a proposed new paid sick leave law in Miami-Dade County, Maddox was there with her son on her hip. At 27, Maddox has had a series of low-paying jobs serving food. She’s been struggling to stay well and hold onto her current job for about a year.

We see our presidential candidates courting the woman’s vote and hear them debate job growth, flexibility, fair pay and even paid sick leave. But for Maddox and other low-wage workers, these issues are not about work-life balance or fairness or politics: They are about survival. Every benefit or new right in the workplace makes a giant difference in whether they can eat dinner, afford electricity, clothe their child or pay rent.

For these workers, the last few years have been particularly tough. As businesses have struggled to stay afloat, low-wage workers increasingly have endured the consequences. Many have had their hours cut and sometimes are even forced to work off the clock. Others have been stiffed out of pay when businesses abruptly closed. And, some have been subjected to bosses who fire them for taking a day off to care for a sick child or family member.

“If you’re a low-wage worker, the deck is stacked against you,” says Noah Warman, a labor lawyer with Sugarman & Susskind in Coral Gables. “Employers want your muscle, not your brain, and you become a cost of doing business. If a business needs to cut corners, this is where they do it.”

Low-wage workers like Maddox are the people who serve us meals, clean our hotel rooms, ring up our purchases and care for our kids or our parents. Increasingly, they are more of the population: During the recovery, most of the employment gains have been concentrated in lower-wage occupations, which grew almost three times as fast as mid-wage and higher-wage occupations, a new National Employment Law Project (NELP) report shows. These workers typically earn less than $13 an hour and lack benefits or flexibility.

“As we move more and more to an economy based on service jobs that cannot be outsourced, we have a huge stake in making sure these jobs are good jobs and these workers are valued,” says Christine Owens, the executive director of NELP.

Around the country, momentum is building for change. States and cities are considering raising the minimum wage, enacting paid sick leave laws and addressing wage theft and fair pay.

In Florida, low-wage workers, typically hesitant to speak up, are becoming more vocal about their work rights. In South Beach, jilted workers recently protested in front of David’s Café saying they were stiffed out of wages at the owner’s second location that closed abruptly. In Hallandale Beach, about 75 Walmart employees protested at a supercenter over the company’s policy of silencing employees who speak up about issues like low wages, not-quite-full-time work weeks and erratic scheduling. In Miami-Dade, low-wage workers rallied to support a proposed county ordinance that would require all employers to offer earned sick time. In Broward County, low-wage workers pushed for a wage theft law to help create an easier avenue for recovery when they aren’t paid for work performed.

Ellen Bravo, who directs Family Values @ Work, a network of state coalitions organizing to win paid sick days and paid family leave, says we are seeing grassroots efforts by people who need some relief. “Something like sick leave may seem like a small step but it is a significant one for helping people stay employed and pay their bills.”

Most often, low-wage workers lack education and courage to speak up about what’s not acceptable, says Jean Souffrant, coordinator at Restaurant Opportunities Center of Miami, which advocates for restaurant worker’s rights. “They don’t want to ruffle feathers because they’re afraid they may not have a job at end of the day.”

Much like Maddox, Erica Sommer has spoken up to support a paid sick time law. Sommer, a Miami Beach bartender, says she still sees hotels and restaurants running so lean that managers don’t have a replacement if a dishwasher, bartender or server calls in sick. At a previous job, she says she was forced to work four days with a full-blown fever. “In the hospitality industry, people survive day to day and they feel they have to risk their health and those who they come in contact with just to get a tiny bit of money,” she says.

Meanwhile employers argue that workers often abuse sick leave and new labor-friendly laws would add an unfair cost to businesses struggling to turn a profit or create higher shareholder value. Cheryl Wilke, a corporate labor attorney with Hinshaw & Culbertson in Fort Lauderdale, says employers already are concerned about the new labor cost implications of healthcare reform. They often believe they either need to keep wages low or reduce their workforce. “It’s a push and pull with the low-wage earner stuck in the middle.”

Maddox feels the push and pull as she tries to keep her job and care for her son. She’s had employers go under owing her money and she’s had her hours reduced to where she can’t support herself. She now feels lucky to have a job. Yet, she wants to see change. She says she supports a paid sick leave law in Miami-Dade because it represents a step in the right direction for everyone. “It’s good for me but it’s also good because I have a lot of contact with customers.”